Democrats have a rising tax drawback with SALT

A growing number of House Democrats are threatening to withhold support from President BidenJoe BidenThe Hill’s Morning Report – Biden officials brace for worst despite vaccine data Congress looks to rein in Biden’s war powers Democrats seize on voting rights; GOP cries foul MORE’s $3 trillion infrastructure proposal over a tax provision affecting state and local taxes.

Democrats from high-tax blue states are insisting on the repeal of a rule that limits state and local tax (SALT) deductions to $10,000, which was enacted as part of the 2017 tax law signed by President TrumpDonald TrumpThe Hill’s Morning Report – Biden officials brace for worst despite vaccine data Trump launches ‘the official website of the 45th President’ Judge rules Ohio professor can sue university over not using student’s preferred pronoun MORE to help offset the cost of some of the tax cuts in the package.

Reps. Thomas Suozzi (N.Y.), Bill PascrellWilliam (Bill) James PascrellOn The Money: Social Security gives IRS data for COVID-19 relief checks | Senate passes bill heading off Medicare cuts Social Security gives IRS data to speed delivery of COVID-19 relief checks On The Money: House Democrats express alarm over slow stimulus checks | Yellen tamps down on debt concerns | Megan Rapinoe visits White House for Equal Pay Day MORE (N.J.) and Josh GottheimerJoshua (Josh) GottheimerDemocrats move smaller immigration bills while eyeing broad overhaul Democrats under pressure to deliver on labor’s ‘litmus test’ bill NJ lawmakers ask Gannett to stop ‘union-busting’ efforts at 3 state newspapers MORE (N.J.) on Tuesday issued a joint statement vowing to oppose any efforts to change the tax code unless the SALT deduction is restored.

The issue could prove to be a serious stumbling block for House Democrats, who can only afford three defections with their razor-thin majority and still pass legislation on their own without any GOP support. 

“No SALT, no deal,” Suozzi told The Hill.

Democrats from states hit hardest by the SALT cap have been pushing for the repeal ever since its enactment, arguing that it hurts middle-class taxpayers, encourages people to move to other states and thereby threatens states’ tax revenue.

“It’s a body blow to my entire state. It’s an existential issue. People are leaving my state because of the cap on the SALT deduction and it’s only been exacerbated by the coronavirus. And when people leave the state because they lost the SALT deduction, then moderate-, low-income (taxpayers) and the rest of us are left behind holding the bag,” Suozzi said.

“Which means either our taxes are going to go up or our services are going to get cut. And neither of those are a good alternative for us.” 

The SALT issue is rearing its head after years of efforts eliminate the cap. In late 2019, House Democrats — joined by five Republicans — passed a bill to temporarily get rid of the SALT cap. 

Its repeal was also included in House Democrats’ COVID-19 relief bill last year. Democrats pushing for the SALT cap repeal opted against drawing a red line in negotiations over the $1.9 trillion stimulus package that Biden signed into law earlier this month.

But now they’re laying down a marker as Biden prepares to unveil the first part of his infrastructure plan on Wednesday in Pittsburgh.

The plan, which will focus on physical infrastructure such as roads, bridges, ports, airports, telecommunications and manufacturing, with a heavy emphasis on tackling climate change and building out green infrastructure, is expected to cost upward of $2 trillion. Another plan focusing on “social infrastructure” such as child care and early education is expected to cost upward of $1 trillion.

White House press secretary Jen PsakiJen PsakiCongress looks to rein in Biden’s war powers Democrats seize on voting rights; GOP cries foul On The Money: CDC extends coronavirus eviction ban through June 30 | Biden to detail infrastructure proposal Wednesday | US won’t quickly lift Trump tariffs on China MORE said Monday that Biden would propose ways to pay for the entirety of the physical infrastructure plan.

Potential options include increasing the corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent, upping the top income tax level from 37 percent to 39.6 percent, boosting taxation on corporate profits earned abroad, taxing capital gains as ordinary income for the wealthy and changing tax rules around inheritance. 

Transportation Secretary Pete ButtigiegPete ButtigiegThe Hill’s 12:30 Report – World celebrates freed Suez Canal ship The Hill’s Morning Report – Biden to talk infrastructure amid border, voting controversies Buttigieg charms Washington with his accessibility MORE said it would not include a gas or mileage tax, which had been floated in recent days.

Estimates for repealing the SALT cap range from $185 billion to $673 billion over a decade, meaning its inclusion would require that much more in offsets to pay for the bill.

Maya MacGuineas, president of the Center for a Responsible Federal Budget, said the move would amount to a $40,000 annual tax cut for millionaires and billionaires, nearly as much as the estimated $51,000 they got from the Trump tax reform.

“Getting rid of the SALT cap is really one of the more regressive tax cuts we could think about. I don’t know why it’s on the table. It would leave huge — huge annual tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires,” she testified at a Senate Budget Committee hearing on tax policy last week.

But lawmakers from blue states that tend to have higher state and local taxes say the cap makes it harder for them to raise revenues, hitting their residents with higher tax bills.

Eleven members of the House Ways and Means Committee sent a letter to Biden in late February asking for a meeting to discuss repealing the cap on the SALT deduction. The Democrats, from a variety of high-tax blue states, who signed the letter are Pascrell, Suozzi, Mike ThompsonCharles (Mike) Michael ThompsonTwo gun bills for law and order go to the Senate The eight Republicans who voted to tighten background checks on guns House approves bills tightening background checks on guns MORE (Calif.), John Larson John Barry LarsonOn The Money: Social Security gives IRS data for COVID-19 relief checks | Senate passes bill heading off Medicare cuts Social Security gives IRS data to speed delivery of COVID-19 relief checks On The Money: House Democrats express alarm over slow stimulus checks | Yellen tamps down on debt concerns | Megan Rapinoe visits White House for Equal Pay Day MORE (Conn.), Danny DavisDaniel (Danny) K. DavisSocial Security gives IRS data to speed delivery of COVID-19 relief checks House Democrats demand answers on slow ,400 checks 7 surprise moments from a tumultuous year in politics MORE (Ill.), Earl BlumenauerEarl BlumenauerProgressives up pressure on Biden to back COVID vaccine patent waiver Bottom line White House defends marijuana policy after report of staffers targeted for past use MORE (Ore.), Brian HigginsBrian HigginsEighth person charged in alleged plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. Whitmer Biden slams Trump for promoting conspiracy theory about man shoved by police Trump claims 75-year-old man shoved by Buffalo police could be part of ‘set up’ MORE (N.Y.), Judy ChuJudy May ChuSunday shows preview: Spotlight on Georgia voting law; lawmakers tackle gun violence, border surge US tensions with China risk fueling anti-Asian harassment at home Sunday shows – Biden administration grapples with border surge MORE (Calif.), Brad SchneiderBradley (Brad) Scott SchneiderTaking a closer look at the future of our nation’s supply chains Blue Dogs push for further action on domestic terrorism Growing extremist threats put more pressure on Biden MORE (Ill.), Jimmy PanettaJames Varni PanettaLawmakers want Pentagon, DOJ to punish current, former military members who participated in riot Capitol riots spark fear of Trump’s military powers in final days Americans want to serve — it’s up to us to give them the chance MORE (Calif.) and Jimmy GomezJimmy GomezHillicon Valley: Twitter says Greene account suspended in error | Justice Dept. indicts hacker connected to massive surveillance breach | Trump reference to ‘Chinese virus’ linked to increase in anti-Asian hashtags Pelosi says top Democrats won’t back measure to expel Greene Twitter says Greene account suspended in error MORE (Calif.). 

“Although restoration of the uncapped SALT deduction is frequently cast as tax relief for the wealthy, in our districts, it is a middle-class priority. The capped SALT deduction discourages middle-class homeownership and charitable contributions, and it adds to the pressure on our state and local governments to make cuts to education, health services, public safety, and other community needs just when our constituents are suffering the most,” the lawmakers wrote in the letter obtained by The Hill. 

But critics of eliminating the SALT deductions say it has no place in the infrastructure plan. Not only does it primarily benefit the wealthy, they argue, but it also would add to the plan’s cost rather than paying for roads, bridges, airports and broadband.

That puts centrist Democrats, budget hawks and even progressives in uncomfortable positions.

“There are some members that feel very strongly about it because they’re in a state where that’s a very big issue for their revenue,” said Rep. Pramila JayapalPramila JayapalSanders creates new headache for Biden on taxes Atlanta shooting suspect’s church condemns ‘extreme and wicked act’ Anger over anti-Asian violence, rhetoric rips through Capitol MORE (D-Wash.), chairwoman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC).

While the CPC is not planning to take a formal position on the matter, Jayapal emphasized that progressives are focused on increasing taxes on the wealthy to help pay for the infrastructure plan.

“I will just say that our focus in terms of the revenues is bringing fairness to the tax system,” Jayapal said when asked about the effort to expand the deduction.

Whichever way the House proceeds on the issue, Democrats will still face problems across the Capitol, where Senate Majority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerSchumer kicks into reelection mode The disgrace that was the Biden press conference Democrats move to crush red states’ rise and threat MORE (D-N.Y.) has been a major proponent of eliminating the cap, despite misgivings from centrists in the caucus.

Those same centrists have also called for Biden to pursue the infrastructure bill on a bipartisan basis, negotiating out a deal that would win over at least 10 Senate Republicans, who are vehemently opposed to reversing the SALT cap.

Psaki said that Biden would include his list of revenue proposals on Wednesday, when he gives the details of the plan, but added that he was open to engaging with Congress on how to cover the costs.

“If they share a goal of building our infrastructure for the future but don’t like the way he’s going to propose to pay for it, we’re happy to look at their proposals,” she said. 

“If they don’t want to pay for it, I guess they can propose that too,” she added.