Toomey, Burr Name out Brazen, Unilateral Try by IRS to Develop Obamacare Subsidies

Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators Pat Toomey (R-Pa.),
Ranking Member of the Senate Banking Committee;
Richard Burr (R-N.C.), Ranking
Member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee;
and Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-La.) sent
a letter
to Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Commissioner Charles Rettig
demanding clarity on its proposal to illegally expand the Affordable Care Act’s
premium tax credit (PTC), which would cost taxpayers billions more each year
and give the federal government an even larger role in families’ health care
decisions. One estimate projects this unilateral move could cost the taxpayers
$45 billion over the next ten years.

 On April 5, 2022, the Biden
Administration proposed a change to the affordability test of
employer-sponsored insurance by basing affordability on the cost of family
coverage, not self-only coverage, in clear violation of existing law. Given
ongoing concerns about the ability of the IRS to act as a non-partisan enforcer
of tax law, the Senators question the IRS’ decision to reverse its long-held
practice of following the law, as written.

 “The proposal in question runs
contrary to the long-held position of the IRS, including under former President
Obama,”
the Senators wrote. “This not only runs counter to the plain
reading of the law, but would dramatically expand spending on Obamacare plans
and result in a significant shift of individuals out of employer-sponsored
insurance and into government-designed and subsidized Obamacare coverage.”

 The Senators also criticized the
Administration for its unconstitutional attempt to unilaterally change existing
law and for failing to provide necessary analyses of the rule’s effects on
government spending and health coverage. Past estimates from the Urban
Institute
and Congressional
Budget Office project the proposal will cost taxpayers tens of billions
over the next decade.

The senators continued, “According to Article I, Section 8
of the U.S. Constitution, Congress is empowered to ‘lay and collect Taxes,
Duties, Imposts and Excises.’ The IRS has no constitutional basis for
unilaterally changing the laws Congress has enacted.

“Moreover, in its proposal the IRS
did not include necessary projections of its impacts on cost and coverage.
President Biden and White House officials are touting estimates that nearly 1
million Americans who already have insurance would receive additional
subsidies, while just 200,000 previously uninsured Americans would gain
coverage under the proposal. This would suggest an analysis has been conducted,
raising questions as to why such an analysis was not published in the
proposal.”

To read the full letter, click here.

 Background:

 During consideration of the
Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, several provisions were included to prevent
the erosion of employer-sponsored health insurance. One specific provision
prevented individuals from receiving subsidies for Obamacare plans if they had
an offer of “affordable” coverage from their employer. Obamacare specified that
if a family received an offer of employer-sponsored health insurance, each
family member is considered to also have an offer of “affordable” coverage if
the employee’s premium contribution for self-only coverage – not family
coverage – is less than 9.5 percent of income.
 

The IRS’ proposed rule reverses this
long-held practice of following the law, as written, and threatens Americans’
access to employer-sponsored insurance.